Groups vs Frames
Let's be honest: the distinction between "groups" and "frames" in Figma can be confusing. This quick guide should help you better identify when to use groups instead of frames.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Let's be honest: the distinction between "groups" and "frames" in Figma can be confusing. This quick guide should help you better identify when to use groups instead of frames.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
New users in Figma tend to use groups instead of frames to, well, group elements together.
But in most cases, the expected behavior by the designer is to start defining the layout of the elements, which is better handled by frames.
Here's a 3min video to help you understand in which cases groups are better than frames.
In Clapy, groups and frames are not converted using the same principles, because they typically don't convey the same concepts in th code:
Frames are the closest representation of a <div> in a 2D design file. -> if you wrap elements in a frame, this frame will be converted to a <div> in the code.
Groups can be used to create complex designs, that can be converted to .svg files. -> if you wrap elements in a group, this group will be exported as a static .svg file.
They should thus be your default "go to" when it comes to wrapping elements together.
Frames are a lot more powerful than groups, since they handle the layout with constraints, especially with the underrated feature of .